Miller v. Quartzview, Inc.
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5
THE ORIGINAL SIXTEEN TO ONE
MINE, INC., a California Corporation;
MICHAEL MILLER; HUGH DAN
O’NEILL III; ROBERT BESSO,
JONATHAN FERRELL; TOM WOODFIN; and KEITH ROBERTSON, 10 Plaintiffs, No. 2:23-cv-00376-TLN-DB v. 12 QUARTZVIEW, INC., a California Corporation; ROGER HAAS; SIMON P. ORDER
WESTBROOK; DOUGLAS W.
CHARLTON; CHARLES CROMPTON JR., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 Defendants.
17 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Quartzview, Inc. (“Quartzview”), Roger Haas, and Simon P. Westbrook’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 6.) Plaintiffs The Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. (“OSTO”), Michael Miller, Hugh Dan O’Neill III, Robert Besso, Jonathan Ferrell, Tom Woodfin, and Keith Robertson (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 10.) For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. ///