Miller v. Quartzview, Inc.

1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 6

THE ORIGINAL SIXTEEN TO ONE

7 MINE, INC., a California Corporation;

MICHAEL MILLER; HUGH DAN

8

O’NEILL III; ROBERT BESSO,

9 JONATHAN FERRELL; TOM WOODFIN; and KEITH ROBERTSON, 10 Plaintiffs, 11 No. 2:23-cv-00376-TLN-DB v. 12 QUARTZVIEW, INC., a California 13 Corporation; ROGER HAAS; SIMON P. ORDER

WESTBROOK; DOUGLAS W.

14 CHARLTON; CHARLES CROMPTON JR., and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive, 15 Defendants. 16

17 18 This matter is before the Court on Defendants Quartzview, Inc. (“Quartzview”), Roger 19 Haas, and Simon P. Westbrook’s (collectively, “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss.1 (ECF No. 6.) 20 Plaintiffs The Original Sixteen to One Mine, Inc. (“OSTO”), Michael Miller, Hugh Dan O’Neill 21 III, Robert Besso, Jonathan Ferrell, Tom Woodfin, and Keith Robertson (collectively, 22 “Plaintiffs”) filed an opposition. (ECF No. 8.) Defendants filed a reply. (ECF No. 10.) For the 23 reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS in part and DENIES in part Defendants’ motion. 24 /// 25

1 The Court notes only Defendants…