Puckett
Puckett v. County of Sacramento
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 12 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB 13 Plaintiff, 14 v. ORDER 15 COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 16 Defendants. 17 18 Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) this matter came before the undersigned on February 23, 19 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel filed on January 19, 2024. (ECF No. 85.) 20 Attorneys Hilary Soloff, Ryan Snyder, and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who 21 was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. After hearing oral 22 argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. On February 28, 2024, the undersigned 23 issued an order granting plaintiff’s January 19, 2024 motion to compel. (ECF No. 94.) 24 The February 23, 2024 hearing was the third time the undersigned had heard a motion to 25 compel brought by plaintiff. On February 5, 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting a 26 motion to compel filed by plaintiff on December 22, 2023. (ECF No. 74.) On February…