Puckett

Puckett v. County of Sacramento

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20242:22-cv-00350California2,458 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 JEREMY PHILLIP PUCKETT, No. 2:22-cv-0350 KJM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., Defendants. 17 Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) this matter came before the undersigned on February 23, 2024, for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel filed on January 19, 2024. (ECF No. 85.) Attorneys Hilary Soloff, Ryan Snyder, and Harrison Frahn appeared on behalf of plaintiff, who was also present. Attorney John Whitefleet appeared on behalf of defendants. After hearing oral argument, plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. On February 28, 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting plaintiff’s January 19, 2024 motion to compel. (ECF No. 94.) The February 23, 2024 hearing was the third time the undersigned had heard a motion to compel brought by plaintiff. On February 5, 2024, the undersigned issued an order granting a motion to compel filed by plaintiff on December 22, 2023. (ECF No. 74.) On February…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.