(SS) Lopez v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 28, 20241:24-cv-00342California1,711 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ORALIA LOPEZ, Case No. 1:24-cv-00342-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Docs. 2, 4) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Orallia Lopez (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of an administrative decision of 19 the Commissioner of Social Security denying Plaintiff’s claim for disability benefits under the 20 Social Security Act. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application 21 to proceed in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). Plaintiff’s 22 application did not contain sufficient information for the Court to determine whether Plaintiff is 23 entitled to proceed IFP, and on March 25, 2024, the Court ordered Plaintiff to file a long-form 24 IFP application. (Doc. 3). On March…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.