Quick

(PC) Jackson v. Quick

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20241:19-cv-01591California865 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 CORNEL JACKSON, Case No. 1:19-cv-01591-EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS

12 v. (ECF Nos. 205, 206). 13

J. QUICK, et al.,

14 Defendant. 15

16 On March 18, 2024, after the jury trial in this matter had concluded, the Court received 17 “Plaintiff’s Objections to the Court’s Errors in the Jury Instructions,” (ECF No. 205) and 18 “Plaintiff’s Objection’s to the Court’s Denial of his Motion for Subpoena Forms and Motion for 19 Extension of Time to Fix Evidence,” (ECF No. 206). On March 21, 2023, Defendants filed 20 responses to Plaintiff’s objections. (ECF Nos. 209, 210). 21 For the reasons set forth below, Plaintiff’s belated objections are overruled. 22 A. Jury Instructions Objections 23 The Court submitted proposed jury instructions to the parties on March 6, 2024. (ECF No. 24 191). The Court held a conference before the start of the jury trial on the morning of March 12, 25 2024, and heard and ruled on all objections to the proposed jury instructions. Plaintiff made 26…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.