Arviza

(HC) Drister v. Arviza

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaMarch 29, 20241:23-cv-01109California600 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 LEONARD O. DRISTER, No. 1:23-cv-1109 JLT EPG (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING

13 v. PETITION FOR WRIT OF HABEAS

CORPUS, DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

14 M. ARVIZA, TO CLOSE CASE, AND DECLINING TO

ISSUE CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY

15 Respondent. (Doc. 9) 16 17 Leonard O. Drister is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of 18 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. This matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 The magistrate judge found “Petitioner’s statutory claims cannot be brought pursuant to 21 28 U.S.C. § 2241,” and recommended the petition be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. (Doc. 9 22 at 1; see id. at 2-3.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Petitioner and 23 notified him that any objections were due within 30 days. (Id. at 3.) The Court advised him that 24 the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.