Francis

(PC) Sekona v. Francis

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20241:19-cv-00529California566 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ETUATE SEKONA, Case No. 1:19-cv-00529-KES-HBK 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

13 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR A

TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER.

14 M. FRANCIS, Doc. 116 15 Defendant. 16 17 Plaintiff Etuate Sekona is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in the 18 instant action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff brings this action against Defendant 19 Francis, an employee of Kern Valley State Prison, alleging Defendant’s deliberate indifference to 20 serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. The matter was referred to a United 21 States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 22 On October 12, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion requesting a temporary restraining order (“TRO”). 23 Doc. 114. On October 30, 2023, the magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations to 24 deny Plaintiff’s motion. Doc. 116. Plaintiff timely filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.