Melendrez

(PC) Palmer v. Melendrez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20241:22-cv-00800California386 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOHNNY CURTIS PALMER, Case No.: 1:22-cv-00800-KES-CDB 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. CERTAIN CLAIMS IN THE FIRST

AMENDED COMPLAINT

14 M. MELENDREZ, (Doc. 15) 15 Defendant.

16

17 Plaintiff Johnny Curtis Palmer is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil 18 rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States 19 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On February 16, 2024, the Magistrate Judge issued findings and recommendations, 21 recommending this action proceed only on the First Amendment claim concerning the right to 22 send and receive mail, with any remaining claims in Plaintiff’s first amended complaint to be 23 dismissed. Doc. 15. The findings and recommendations were served on Plaintiff and contained 24 notice that any objections were to be filed within fourteen (14) days of service. The Magistrate 25 Judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.