(PC)Yandell

(PC)Yandell v. Washington

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20242:21-cv-00469California1,610 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RONALD DEAN YANDELL, No. 2:21-cv-00469 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER FINDING SERVICE APPROPRIATE

AS TO CERTAIN DEFENDANTS AND

DONALD WASHINGTON, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO

DISMISS REMAINING DEFENDANTS

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff was, at the time of filing, a federal pretrial detainee proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This proceeding was referred to the undersigned by Local Rule 302 pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff has filed a third amended complaint that is now before the court for screening. ECF No. 54. I. Screening Requirement As plaintiff was previously advised, the court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.