(PC)Yandell

(PC)Yandell v. Washington

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20242:21-cv-00469California949 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RONALD DEAN YANDELL, No. 2:21-cv-00469 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. ORDER DONALD WASHINGTON, et al., Defendants. 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend his complaint along with a proposed third amended complaint. ECF Nos. 53-54. Defendants have filed an opposition to the motion to amend. ECF No. 57. For the reasons outlined below, the court will grant plaintiff’s motion to amend. By separate order, the court will screen plaintiff’s third amended complaint. I. Procedural History In the court’s screening order of the second amended complaint, plaintiff was denied further leave to amend because there were no additional facts he could allege that would state claims upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 15 at 11. Thus, this case is presently proceeding only on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.