(PC)Yandell
(PC)Yandell v. Washington
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 10 RONALD DEAN YANDELL, No. 2:21-cv-00469 DAD AC 11 Plaintiff, 12 v. ORDER 13 DONALD WASHINGTON, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 17 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion to amend his 18 complaint along with a proposed third amended complaint. ECF Nos. 53-54. Defendants have 19 filed an opposition to the motion to amend. ECF No. 57. For the reasons outlined below, the 20 court will grant plaintiff’s motion to amend. By separate order, the court will screen plaintiff’s 21 third amended complaint. 22 I. Procedural History 23 In the court’s screening order of the second amended complaint, plaintiff was denied 24 further leave to amend because there were no additional facts he could allege that would state 25 claims upon which relief could be granted. ECF No. 15 at 11. Thus, this case is presently 26 proceeding only on…