(PC) McClinton v. St. Andre

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANDRE KAEFUNN MCCLINTON, No. 2:23-cv-0379 DB P 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 ROBERT ST. ANDRE, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights 18 action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On screening plaintiff’s complaint, this court found plaintiff stated 19 minimally sufficient First Amendment claims against defendants Mosley, Thor, Brown, and 20 Harrod. This court further found that plaintiff did not state cognizable claims against the 21 supervisory defendants St. Andre and Diaz. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was given the option of 22 proceeding on his First Amendment claims against defendants Mosely, Thor, Brown, and Harrod 23 or amending his complaint. He was ordered to file a notice informing the court which option he 24 chose. 25 Plaintiff recently filed the notice of election. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff states that he wishes 26 to amend his complaint and notifies the court that he filed a first…