(PC) McClinton v. St. Andre

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20242:23-cv-00379California1,821 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANDRE KAEFUNN MCCLINTON, No. 2:23-cv-0379 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER ROBERT ST. ANDRE, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. §1983. On screening plaintiff’s complaint, this court found plaintiff stated minimally sufficient First Amendment claims against defendants Mosley, Thor, Brown, and Harrod. This court further found that plaintiff did not state cognizable claims against the supervisory defendants St. Andre and Diaz. (ECF No. 9.) Plaintiff was given the option of proceeding on his First Amendment claims against defendants Mosely, Thor, Brown, and Harrod or amending his complaint. He was ordered to file a notice informing the court which option he chose. Plaintiff recently filed the notice of election. (ECF No. 15.) Plaintiff states that he wishes to amend his complaint and notifies the court that he filed a first…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.