(PS) Rigor v. Sacramento LGBT Community Center

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SOROYA MARIA RIGOR, No. 2:24–cv–36–DJC–KJN PS 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. (ECF No. 3.) 14 SACRAMENTO LGBT COMMUNITY CENTER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 On February 28, 2024 the magistrate judge filed findings and 18 recommendations (ECF No. 3), which were served on the parties and which contained 19 notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed 20 within fourteen (14) days. No objections were filed. Accordingly, the court presumes 21 that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 22 (9th Cir. 1979). The magistrate judge’s conclusions of law are reviewed de novo. See 23 Britt v. Simi Valley Unified School Dist., 708 F.2d 452, 454 (9th Cir. 1983). 24 The Court has reviewed the applicable legal standards and, good cause 25 appearing, concludes that it is appropriate to adopt the findings and 26 recommendations in full. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 27 1. The findings and…