(PS) Hill v. City of Sacramento

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ARNITHA HILL, et al., No. 2:22-cv-01625 DJC AC PS 12 Plaintiffs, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 14 CITY OF SACRAMENTO, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiffs are proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the 18 undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). This case has been 19 pending since September 16, 2022. ECF No. 1. Defendants moved to dismiss the initial 20 complaint, and that complaint was dismissed with leave to amend. ECF Nos. 14, 15. Plaintiffs 21 filed a first amended complaint. ECF No. 16. Defendants moved to dismiss the first amended 22 complaint, and following a hearing on the motion, the first amended complaint was dismissed 23 with partial leave to amend. ECF Nos. 28, 30. Plaintiffs filed a second amended complaint. ECF 24 No. 31. 25 On February 16, 2024, defendants filed a motion to dismiss plaintiff’s second amended 26 complaint, set to be heard on April 10, 2024. …