Civil Rights Dept. v. Grimmway Enterprises, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 1, 20242:21-cv-01552California3,688 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CIVIL RIGHTS DEPARTMENT, No. 2:21-cv-01552-DAD-AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S

REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION OF

14 GRIMMWAY ENTERPRISES, INC., THE ASSIGNED MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

DECEMBER 7, 2023 DISCOVERY ORDER

15 Defendant. (Doc. No. 47) 16 17 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s request for reconsideration of the assigned 18 magistrate judge’s discovery order dated December 7, 2023 (Doc. No. 45), in which the 19 magistrate judge denied in part plaintiff’s motion for a protective order (Doc. No. 43). (Doc. No. 20 47.) On December 28, 2023, defendant filed an opposition to the pending request for 21 reconsideration. (Doc. No. 48.)1 For the reasons explained below, plaintiff’s request for 22 reconsideration will be denied. 23 1 On January 8, 2024, plaintiff filed an unauthorized reply brief in support of the pending request 24 for reconsideration. (Doc. No. 51.) On January 11, 2024, defendant filed a response for the purpose of objecting…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.