Bently

(PC) Brackett v. Bently

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 2, 20242:23-cv-02880California288 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DESMOND CHARLES BRACKETT, No. 2:23-cv-02880 DAD AC Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS MATTHEW CHRISTOPHER BENTLY, Defendant. 16 By an order filed February 16, 2024, plaintiff was granted an extension of time to file a completed in forma pauperis affidavit and a certified copy of his prison trust account statement. ECF No. 9. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so within the time provided would result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Id. The thirty-day period has now expired, and plaintiff has not responded to the court’s order and has not filed the required documents. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being served with these…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.