Cano

(PC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20241:23-cv-01764California630 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAKAZULU SIGIDI Case No.: 1:23-cv-001764-JLT-SKO

KASENZANGAKHONA,

ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, FILING OF MARCH 27, 2024 13 v. (Doc. 16)

L. CANO, et al.,

15 Defendants.

17 Plaintiff Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 26, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On January 22, 2024, Plaintiff filed a “Writ of Mandate.” (Doc. 10.) On March 12, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 12.) The Court found Plaintiff’s original complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id. at 4-12.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint within 21 days, curing the deficiencies identified in the complaint. (Id. at 13-14.) On March 12, 2024, the Court also issued Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff’s Request For…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.