Epperson

Epperson v. National Assembly House of Commons United Nations

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20241:23-cv-01759California1,328 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, No. 1:23-cv-01759-KES-SKO

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

v. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, HOUSE OF

COMMONS, UNITED NATIONS, TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

Defendants. 17

19 Plaintiff Chris J. Epperson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on 20 December 22, 2023. (Doc. 1). Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concluded that it failed 21 to state any cognizable claims and granted Plaintiff the option to file a First Amended Complaint, 22 to stand on his current complaint, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff 23 subsequently filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint” (Doc. 8) and various notices 24 (Docs. 6, 7) related to the First Amended Complaint. The Court concludes that the First 25 Amended Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims and recommends dismissing it without 26 leave to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.