Epperson
Epperson v. National Assembly House of Commons United Nations
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, No. 1:23-cv-01759-KES-SKO
12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION
THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE
13 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO
AMEND
14 NATIONAL ASSEMBLY, HOUSE OF
COMMONS, UNITED NATIONS, TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE
15
16 Defendants. 17 18
19 Plaintiff Chris J. Epperson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on 20 December 22, 2023. (Doc. 1). Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concluded that it failed 21 to state any cognizable claims and granted Plaintiff the option to file a First Amended Complaint, 22 to stand on his current complaint, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 5). Plaintiff 23 subsequently filed a document titled “First Amended Complaint” (Doc. 8) and various notices 24 (Docs. 6, 7) related to the First Amended Complaint. The Court concludes that the First 25 Amended Complaint fails to state any cognizable claims and recommends dismissing it without 26 leave to…