(PS) Shinshuri v. California Physicians' Services

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20242:18-cv-03143California1,058 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TAMME SHINSHURI, No. 2:18-cv-03143 TLN CKD PS Plaintiffs, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA PHYSICIANS’ SERVICES dba Blue Shield of California, 15 Defendant. 16 Before the court is defendant’s motion to dismiss this action pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6) under the doctrine of res judicata. ECF No. 35. Plaintiff has filed an opposition, and defendant has filed a reply. ECF Nos. 39 & 40. On December 21, 2023, the motion was taken under submission without appearance and argument pursuant to Local Rule 230. ECF No. 41. For the reasons set forth below, the undersigned will recommend that defendant’s motion be granted. I. Legal Standard In order to survive dismissal for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b)(6), a complaint must contain more than a “formulaic recitation of the elements of a cause of action”; it must contain factual allegations sufficient to “raise a right to relief above the speculative level.” Bell…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.