Warden

(HC) Morales v. Warden

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20242:23-cv-00761California532 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 ANTONIO ALONSO MORALES, No. 2:23-cv-00761-DAD-CKD (HC) 12 Petitioner, 13 v. ORDER ADOPTING FIDNINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

14 WARDEN, THIS ACTION 15 Respondent. (Doc. Nos. 5, 10, 12) 16 17 Petitioner Antonio Alonso Morales is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition 18 for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241. The matter was referred to a United 19 States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 20 On January 23, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations 21 recommending that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, due to petitioner’s failure to 22 prosecute this action and failure to obey a court order. (Doc. No. 12.) Specifically, in an order 23 issued on December 7, 2023, petitioner was ordered to file an opposition or a statement of non- 24 opposition to respondent’s pending motion to dismiss within thirty days, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.