Epperson

Epperson v. United States Congress

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20241:23-cv-01687California2,069 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 CHRIS JONATHAN EPPERSON, No. 1:23-cv-01687-KES-SKO

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

THAT PLAINTIFF’S COMPLAINT BE

13 v. DISMISSED WITHOUT LEAVE TO

AMEND

14 UNITED STATES CONGRESS, THE

REPUBLICAN PARTY, HOUSE OF TWENTY-ONE DAY DEADLINE

15 REPRESENTATIVES, BILL CLINTON,

BARACK OBAMA, DONALD TRUMP,

16 GEORGE BUSH,

17 Defendants. 18

19 20

21 Plaintiff Chris J. Epperson, proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, filed a complaint on 22 December 5, 2023. (Doc. 1). Upon reviewing the complaint, the Court concluded that it failed to 23 state any cognizable claims and granted Plaintiff the option to file a First Amended Complaint, to 24 stand on his current complaint, or to file a notice of voluntary dismissal. (Doc. 9). Plaintiff 25 subsequently filed a First Amended Complaint (Doc. 11) and various notices (Docs. 14, 15, 16) 26 27 28 1 related to the First Amended Complaint.1 The Court concludes that the First Amended Complaint 2 fails to state any cognizable claims…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.