(HC)Bronson

(HC)Bronson v. Fresno Federal Courthouse

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 3, 20241:24-cv-00092California821 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DUANE EDWARD BRONSON, Case No. 1:24-cv-00092 JLT CDB (HC)

12 Petitioner, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS TO DISMISS

13 v. PETITION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR

PETITIONER’S FAILURE TO PROSECUTE,

14 FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH A COURT

FRESNO FEDERAL COURTHOUSE,

ORDER, AND FAILURE TO EXHAUST

15 STATE REMEDIES Respondent. 16 (Doc. 9)

17 18 Petitioner Duane Edward Bronson (“Petitioner”) is a state prisoner proceeding prose with 19 a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. 1). Based on its initial 20 review of the petition, on February 1, 2024, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order to show 21 cause why the petition should not be dismissed for Petitioner’s failure to name a proper 22 respondent and failure to exhaust state remedies. (Doc. 4). Petitioner did not respond to the 23 Court’s order to show cause. Accordingly, on March 1, 2024,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.