Kernan

(PC) Meyers v. Kernan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20241:22-cv-00539California618 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 9 LEON LEE MEYERS, No. 1:22-cv-00539-KES-SAB (PC) 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANTS’

MOTION TO STAY MERITS-BASED

11 v. DISCOVERY AND VACATE DEADLINES 12 SCOTT KERNAN, et al.,, (ECF No. 49) 13 Defendants. 14 15 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 16 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion to stay merits-based discovery, filed 17 February 26, 2024. (ECF No. 49.) Plaintiff has not filed an opposition and the time to do so has 18 passed. Local Rule 230(l). 19 The Court is vested with broad discretion to manage discovery. Dichter-Mad Family 20 Partners, LLP v. U.S., 709 F.3d 749, 751 (9th Cir. 2013) (per curiam); Hunt v. County of Orange, 21 672 F.3d 606, 616 (9th Cir. 2012); Surfvivor Media, Inc. v. Survivor Prods., 406 F.3d 625, 635 22 (9th Cir. 2005); Hallett v. Morgan, 296 F.3d 732, 751 (9th Cir. 2002). Pursuant to Rule 26(c)(1), 23 the Court may, for good cause,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.