(SS) Flores v. Commissioner of Social Security

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 GRICELDA FLORES, Case No. 1:24-cv-00378-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Doc. 6) 16 17 18 Plaintiff Gricelda Flores (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of an administrative decision of 19 the Commissioner of Social Security denying Petitioner’s claim for disability benefits under the 20 Social Security Act. (Doc. 1). On April 1, 2024, Plaintiff filed a motion to proceed in forma 21 pauperis. (Doc. 4). On April 2, 2024, the Court denied the motion without prejudice as 22 Plaintiff’s sworn attestation was undated. (Doc. 5). That same day, Plaintiff filed a renewed, 23 signed and dated motion to proceed in forma pauperis. (Doc. 6). 24 I. Proceeding in forma pauperis 25 The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of fees “by 26 a person who…