(PS) Jutla v. Redfin Corporation

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RAJNINDER (RAVEN) JUTLA and IN No. 2:24-cv-0984 KJM AC

LOVE PROPERTIES LLC

12 (REGISTERED IN WASHINGTON), 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER 14 v. 15 REDFIN CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 18 Plaintiff, who is proceeding in pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma 19 pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. The federal venue statute provides that a 20 civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all 21 defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which 22 a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part 23 of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an 24 action may otherwise be brought as provided in this action, any judicial district in which any 25 defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 26 1391(b). 27 …