(PS) Jutla v. Redfin Corporation
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAJNINDER (RAVEN) JUTLA and IN No. 2:24-cv-0984 KJM AC
LOVE PROPERTIES LLC
(REGISTERED IN WASHINGTON), Plaintiffs, ORDER v. REDFIN CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation, 16 Defendants. 17 Plaintiff, who is proceeding in pro se, has filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. ECF No. 2. The federal venue statute provides that a civil action “may be brought in (1) a judicial district in which any defendant resides, if all defendants are residents of the State in which the district is located, (2) a judicial district in which a substantial part of the events or omissions giving rise to the claim occurred, or a substantial part of property that is the subject of the action is situated, or (3) if there is no district in which an action may otherwise be brought as provided in this action, any judicial district in which any defendant is subject to the court’s personal jurisdiction with respect to such action.” 28 U.S.C. § 1391(b). 27 …