Cano

(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20241:24-cv-00358California1,889 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SHAKAZULU KASENZANGAKHONA, No. 1:24-cv-00358-SKO (HC) Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

TO SUMMARILY DISMISS PETITION

L. CANO, et al.,

[TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION Respondents. DEADLINE]

17 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on March 27, 2024, challenging the execution of his sentence. The Court finds that the petition is unexhausted, it should abstain from interfering in state proceedings, and it lacks jurisdiction. Thus, the Court will recommend the petition be DISMISSED. DISCUSSION A. Preliminary Review of Petition Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases allows a district court to dismiss a petition if it “plainly appears…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.