Cano

(HC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20241:24-cv-00358California1,889 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAKAZULU KASENZANGAKHONA, No. 1:24-cv-00358-SKO (HC) 12 Petitioner, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE

13 v.

FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION

14 TO SUMMARILY DISMISS PETITION

L. CANO, et al.,

15 [TWENTY-ONE DAY OBJECTION Respondents. DEADLINE] 16

17 18 Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a petition for 19 writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner filed the instant habeas petition on 20 March 27, 2024, challenging the execution of his sentence. The Court finds that the petition is 21 unexhausted, it should abstain from interfering in state proceedings, and it lacks jurisdiction. 22 Thus, the Court will recommend the petition be DISMISSED. 23 DISCUSSION 24 A. Preliminary Review of Petition 25 Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases allows a district court to dismiss a 26 petition if it “plainly appears…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.