Figueroa

(PC) Rabb v. Figueroa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20241:23-cv-00843California6,193 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DAMEN D. RABB, No. 1:23-cv-00843-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING DEFENDANTS’

13 v. EXHAUSTION MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT

14 ESTEVEN FIGUEROA, et al., (ECF No. 32) 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Isaiah J. Petillo is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 18 action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 19 Currently before the Court is Defendants’ motion for summary judgment for failure to 20 exhaust the administrative remedies, filed February 20, 2024. 21 I. 22 RELEVANT BACKGROUND 23 This action is proceeding against Defendants Figueroa and Chavez for failure to protect 24 under the Eighth Amendment and retaliation under the First Amendment. 25 Plaintiff was represented by counsel at the time he filed the instant complaint. (ECF No. 26 1.) 27 Defendants filed an answer to the complaint on August 28, 2023. (ECF No. 16.) 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.