(SS) Murillo v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 4, 20241:23-cv-01546California601 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 IRMA MURILLO, Case No. 1:23-cv-01546-HBK1 12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING AWARD AND

PAYMENT OF ATTORNEYS FEES UNDER

13 v. THE EQUAL ACCESS TO JUSTICE ACT 14 MARTIN O’MALLEY, (Doc. No. 17)

COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL

15 SECURITY, 16 Defendant. 17 18 Pending before the Court is the parties’ stipulated motion for award of attorney’s fees 19 filed on April 1, 2024. (Doc. No. 17). The parties agree to an award of attorney’s fees and 20 expenses to Plaintiff’s attorney, Harvey P. Sackett of Sackett & Associates, A Professional Law 21 Corporation, in the amount of $1,064.98 in attorney fees and expenses, pursuant to the Equal 22 Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412. (Id.). 23 On March 15, 2024, this Court granted the parties’ stipulated motion for a remand and 24 remanded the case pursuant to sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) to the Commissioner for 25 further administrative proceedings. (Doc. No. 15). Judgment was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.