Puckett

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 Jeremy Phillip Puckett, No. 2:22-cv-00350-KJM-DB Plaintiff, ORDER v. County of Sacramento, et al., 1S Defendants. 16 The magistrate judge granted plaintiff's motion to compel Federal Rule 30(b)(6) depositions, Dep. Order, ECF No. 74, to compel productions of documents, Produc. Order, ECF No. 80, and responses to interrogatories, Interrog. Order, ECF No. 94. Defendants move for 20 reconsideration of all three orders, First Mot., ECF No. 84; Second Mot., ECF No. 92; Third Mot., ECF No. 109, and plaintiff opposes, First Opp’n, ECF No. 89; Second Opp’n, ECF No. 102; Third Opp’n 117. Defendants’ motions are denied. 23 I. LEGAL STANDARD A district judge may consider timely requests to “modify or set aside any part of the 25 [magistrate judge’s] order that is clearly erroneous or is contrary to law.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 72(a); 26 see also 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(A); E.D. Cal. L.R.…