Armstrong

Armstrong v. Voss & Klein, LLC

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20242:23-cv-01949California3,176 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 AMANDA ARMSTRONG, No. 2:23-cv-01949-DJC-AC

12 Plaintiff, v. 13 ORDER VOSS & KLEIN, LLC, et al., 14 Defendants. 15

16

17 Pending before the Court is a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings brought

18 by Defendants Trans Union LLC (“Trans Union”) and Equifax Information Services LLC

19 (“Equifax”) (collectively, the “CRA Defendants”). (ECF No. 23.)

20 Having considered the Parties’ briefing and arguments, the Court hereby grants

21 this Motion and dismisses Plaintiff’s claims against the CRA Defendants with prejudice.

22 BACKGROUND 23 In or around 2019, Plaintiff Amanda Armstrong briefly worked as a receptionist 24 for Dr. Hung at Medical Village Family Dental, a private practice dental office. (Compl. 25 (ECF No. 1) ¶ 30). Plaintiff contends that Dr. Hung secretly recorded private 26 conversations, improperly directed other employees to perform certain dental 27 procedures while not licensed to do so, and instructed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.