Rivera
Rivera v. Nibco Inc
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARTHA RIVERA, et al., Case No. 1:99-cv-06443-JLT-HBK Plaintiffs, ORDER DIRECTING DEFENDANT TO FILE
LIMITED SURREPLY
v.
APRIL 19, 2024 DEADLINE
NIBCO INC, et al., ARGUMENT: MAY 16, 2024 at 10:00 A.M. Defendants. 16 Pending before the Court is the Administrative Motion to Unseal Certain Filing filed on January 29, 2024 by Christopher Ho, former counsel for the plaintiffs. (Doc. No. 794, “Motion”). Defendant Nibco filed a Response to the Motion, in which it does not oppose to the unsealing of the requested documents, but conditions to do so on extensive redactions, each of which it contends are supported by “good cause.” (See Doc. No. 802). In Reply, Ho asserts that Defendant’s proposed redactions must be justified under the more demanding “compelling reasons” standard to rebut the presumption of public access to documents related to a dispositive motion. (See Doc. No. 807) (citing Kamakana v. City & Cnty. of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1175 25 …