(PC) Montgomery v. Madera Department of Corrections

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAULINE MONTGOMERY, No. 1:23-cv-00919-JLT-SAB (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

13 v. ACTION 14 MADERA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et (Doc. 21) al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant 19 to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey court orders and failed 20 to prosecute the action after he failed to respond to the Court’s screening order in any way, 21 including by filing an amended complaint to cure the pleading defects identified by the Court. 22 (Doc. 21.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed. (Id. at 8.) 23 The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that 24 any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 21 at 8.) The Court advised him that the “[f]ailure 25 to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” …