(PC) Montgomery v. Madera Department of Corrections

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 PAULINE MONTGOMERY, No. 1:23-cv-00919-JLT-SAB (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DISMISSING

v. ACTION MADERA DEPT. OF CORRECTIONS, et (Doc. 21) al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The magistrate judge found Plaintiff failed to obey court orders and failed to prosecute the action after he failed to respond to the Court’s screening order in any way, including by filing an amended complaint to cure the pleading defects identified by the Court. (Doc. 21.) Therefore, the magistrate judge recommended the action be dismissed. (Id. at 8.) The Court served the Findings and Recommendations on Plaintiff and notified him that any objections were due within 14 days. (Doc. 21 at 8.) The Court advised him that the “[f]ailure to file objections within the specified time may result in waiver of rights on appeal.” …