Carter
Carter v. Jackson
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11 JEFFREY CARTER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01775-KES-SAB
12 Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
STAY DISCOVERY; PERMIT
13 v. DISCOVERY; OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
14 WILLARD L. JACKSON, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE
DEFENDANTS AND LEAVE TO SERVE
15 Defendants. BY WAY OF SUBSTITUTE SERVICE
AND PUBLICATION
16 (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27) 17
18 On April 3, 2024, Defendant Vicent Petrescu, proceeding pro se, filed an “emergency 19 motion” to stay discovery pending class certification (ECF No. 26); a motion “to permit 20 discovery about Plaintiff’s counsel’s qualifications to be appointed class counsel (ECF No. 25); 21 and an opposition to Plaintiff’s unopposed motion enlarging time to serve six other Defendants 22 in this action (ECF No. 27). The Court finds oppositions by Plaintiff would not aid the Court in 23 deciding the issues and shall address each filing in turn herein. 24 A. Emergency Motion to Stay Discovery and Defendant’s Request for…