Carter
Carter v. Jackson
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20241:23-cv-01775California1,322 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JEFFREY CARTER, Case No. 1:23-cv-01775-KES-SAB
Plaintiff, ORDER RE DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO
STAY DISCOVERY; PERMIT
v. DISCOVERY; OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR
WILLARD L. JACKSON, et al., EXTENSION OF TIME TO SERVE
DEFENDANTS AND LEAVE TO SERVE
Defendants. BY WAY OF SUBSTITUTE SERVICE
AND PUBLICATION
16 (ECF Nos. 25, 26, 27)
On April 3, 2024, Defendant Vicent Petrescu, proceeding pro se, filed an “emergency motion” to stay discovery pending class certification (ECF No. 26); a motion “to permit discovery about Plaintiff’s counsel’s qualifications to be appointed class counsel (ECF No. 25); and an opposition to Plaintiff’s unopposed motion enlarging time to serve six other Defendants in this action (ECF No. 27). The Court finds oppositions by Plaintiff would not aid the Court in deciding the issues and shall address each filing in turn herein. A. Emergency Motion to Stay Discovery and Defendant’s Request for…