Gioiosa

(PS) Rudden v. Gioiosa

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20242:22-cv-01837California895 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DAVID RUDDEN, No. 2:22-cv-1837 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS RAYMOND GIOIOSA, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff David Rudden is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). On November 28, 2022, plaintiff requested entry of defendant’s default. (ECF No. 7.) On December 1, 2022, the Clerk of the Court entered defendant’s default. (ECF No. 8.) On April 10, 2023, the undersigned issued plaintiff an order to show cause due to plaintiff’s failure to prosecute this action. (ECF No. 10.) On October 27, 2023, plaintiff filed a notice of change of address stating that any mail sent to plaintiff’s “previous address after January 17, 2023, was not received.” (Id. at 1.) The filing also included a declaration from plaintiff stating that plaintiff had “been combating a serious illness” but “resumed . .…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.