Smith v. Mcdonalds Incorporated

1

2

3

4

5

6

7

8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

11 CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00204-SAB

12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

13 v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER FAILURE TO

14 MCDONALDS INCORPORATED, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

15 Defendants. (ECF No. 5) 16

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

17 DAYS

18 19 Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on 20 February 15, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead 21 filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) 22 Upon review of the application, the Court found Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma 23 pauperis was incomplete. (ECF No. 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff stated she was currently 24 employed but failed to state her take-home salary or wages. (Id. at 1.) On February 20, 2024, 25 the Court issued an order notifying Plaintiff she…