Smith v. Mcdonalds Incorporated

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:24-cv-00204California1,347 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00204-SAB

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION

v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH

COURT ORDER FAILURE TO

MCDONALDS INCORPORATED, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY

FILING FEE

Defendants. (ECF No. 5)

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

DAYS

18 Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on February 15, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Upon review of the application, the Court found Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete. (ECF No. 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff stated she was currently employed but failed to state her take-home salary or wages. (Id. at 1.) On February 20, 2024, the Court issued an order notifying Plaintiff she…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.