Smith v. Mcdonalds Incorporated
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:24-cv-00204California1,347 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
CANDACE SMITH, Case No. 1:24-cv-00204-SAB
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS
RECOMMENDING DISMISSING ACTION
v. FOR FAILURE TO COMPLY WITH
COURT ORDER FAILURE TO
MCDONALDS INCORPORATED, et al., PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO PAY
FILING FEE
Defendants. (ECF No. 5)
OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN
DAYS
18 Candace Smith (“Plaintiff”), proceeding pro se, filed a complaint in this action on February 15, 2024. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee in this action and instead filed an application to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF No. 2.) Upon review of the application, the Court found Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis was incomplete. (ECF No. 3.) Specifically, Plaintiff stated she was currently employed but failed to state her take-home salary or wages. (Id. at 1.) On February 20, 2024, the Court issued an order notifying Plaintiff she…