(PS) Amajioyi v. Biomarin Pharmaceutical, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20242:20-cv-02292California926 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHUCK C. AMAJIOYI, No. 2:20-cv-2292 DJC DB PS Plaintiff, v. ORDER BIOMARIN PHARMACEUTICAL, INC., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff Chuck C. Amajioyi is proceeding in this action pro se. This matter was referred to the undersigned in accordance with Local Rule 302(c)(21) and 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1). Plaintiff commenced this action on November 17, 2020, by filing a complaint and paying the required filing fee. (ECF No. 1.) On November 18, 2020, summons for the defendant was issued. (ECF No. 2.) That same day plaintiff was served with a letter that advised plaintiff that Rule 4(m) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure provides that a defendant must be dismissed if service of the summons and complaint is not accomplished on the defendant within 90 days after the complaint was filed. (ECF No. 2.) Despite the passage of considerable time, and multiple orders by the undersigned, plaintiff has failed to file proof of service on the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.