Ortiz

(PC) Rios v. Ortiz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:23-cv-01595California455 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSE RIOS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01595-HBK (PC)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

13 v. (Doc. No. 9)

14 ORTIZ, 15 Defendant. 16 17 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s pleading titled “Motion Requesting Court Order on 18 the Fresno County, Jail for Access to Courts,” filed April 4, 2024. (Doc. No. 9, “Motion”). 19 Plaintiff requests “the court to order the Fresno County Jail to allow Plaintiff access to courts, 20 particularly access to the law library. Access to Courts is solidified in the First Amendment; . . .” 21 (Id. at 1). 22 Plaintiff as a prisoner has a constitutionally protected right of access to courts guaranteed 23 by the Fourteenth Amendment. Bounds v. Smith, 430 U.S. 817, 821 (1977). Implicit within this 24 right of access to courts is the prisoner’s right to have access to adequate law libraries or legal 25 assistance from trained individuals. “[T]he fundamental constitutional right of access to the 26 courts…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.