Rivas
(PC) See v. Rivas
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOU SENG SEE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01354-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
v. (ECF No. 29) RIVAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mou Seng See (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Rivas, Roman, Rivera, and Dorado for deliberate indifference to the need for medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed April 4, 2024. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel because he believes something illegal happened in this incident, and professional assistance may be required to protect his interests and prove his claim the right way within the law. (Id.) Plaintiff is informed that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed…