Rivas
(PC) See v. Rivas
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MOU SENG SEE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01354-KES-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL
13 v. (ECF No. 29) 14 RIVAS, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 Plaintiff Mou Seng See (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on 19 Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Rivas, Roman, Rivera, and Dorado for 20 deliberate indifference to the need for medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. 21 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed April 4, 22 2024. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel because he believes something 23 illegal happened in this incident, and professional assistance may be required to protect his 24 interests and prove his claim the right way within the law. (Id.) 25 Plaintiff is informed that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed…