Rivas

(PC) See v. Rivas

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:23-cv-01354California522 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MOU SENG SEE, Case No. 1:23-cv-01354-KES-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR

APPOINTMENT OF COUNSEL

v. (ECF No. 29) RIVAS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Mou Seng See (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds on Plaintiff’s first amended complaint against Defendants Rivas, Roman, Rivera, and Dorado for deliberate indifference to the need for medical care in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for appointment of counsel, filed April 4, 2024. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff requests appointment of counsel because he believes something illegal happened in this incident, and professional assistance may be required to protect his interests and prove his claim the right way within the law. (Id.) Plaintiff is informed that he does not have a constitutional right to appointed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.