(PC) Kinkade v. Avenal State Prison

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20241:23-cv-00964California567 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10 ROBERT WILLIAM KINKADE, Case No. 1:23-cv-00964 JLT EPG (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING IN FULL THE FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS v. TO DISMISS THIS ACTION WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

AVENAL STATE PRISON, PROSECUTE AND FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDERS, Defendant. AND DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO CLOSE THE CASE

(Doc. 11)

17 Plaintiff Robert Kinkade is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleged that the water at Avenal State Prison is contaminated. (Doc. 1.) The Court referred the matter to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. The assigned magistrate screened Plaintiff’s complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a) and found that “Plaintiff’s complaint fails to state any cognizable claims.” (Doc. 10 at 6.) …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.