Nixon

(PC) Almaguer Jr. v. Nixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:24-cv-00399California1,729 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JAVIER ALMAGUER, JR., No. 1:24-cv-00399 GSA (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT

v. BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

K. HIXON, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE OR

PROOF OF EXHAUSTION DUE MAY 8,

2024 17 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. Before this Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint. ECF No. 1. For the reasons stated below, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why this matter should not be summarily dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this action. In the alternative, he will be permitted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.