Nixon

(PC) Almaguer Jr. v. Nixon

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:24-cv-00399California1,729 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JAVIER ALMAGUER, JR., No. 1:24-cv-00399 GSA (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY THIS MATTER SHOULD NOT

13 v. BE SUMMARILY DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO EXHAUST

14 K. HIXON, et al., ADMINISTRATIVE REMEDIES 15 Defendants. PLAINTIFF’S SHOWING OF CAUSE OR

PROOF OF EXHAUSTION DUE MAY 8,

16 2024 17 18 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis, has filed this civil 19 rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States 20 Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. 21 Before this Court is Plaintiff’s original complaint. ECF No. 1. For the reasons stated 22 below, Plaintiff shall be ordered to show cause why this matter should not be summarily 23 dismissed for failure to exhaust administrative remedies prior to filing this action. In the 24 alternative, he will be permitted to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.