Cervantes

(PC) Perez v. Cervantes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:22-cv-00390California1,440 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 RANDY PEREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00390-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

REQUESTING DOCUMENTS

13 v. (ECF No. 43) 14 CERVANTES,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

15 Defendant. TO APPOINT COUNSEL 16 (ECF No. 44) 17 18 Plaintiff Randy Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Cervantes for 20 excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate 21 Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 40.) 22 Pursuant to the Court’s March 20, 2023 discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for 23 completion of all discovery, including filing all motions to compel discovery, was November 20, 24 2023. (ECF No. 34.) 25 Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions requesting documents and appointment 26 of counsel, both filed April 4, 2024. (ECF Nos. 43, 44.) Defendant has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.