Cervantes

(PC) Perez v. Cervantes

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:22-cv-00390California1,440 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RANDY PEREZ, Case No. 1:22-cv-00390-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

REQUESTING DOCUMENTS

v. (ECF No. 43) CERVANTES,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

Defendant. TO APPOINT COUNSEL (ECF No. 44) 17 Plaintiff Randy Perez (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action proceeds against Defendant Cervantes for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment. All parties have consented to Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (ECF No. 40.) Pursuant to the Court’s March 20, 2023 discovery and scheduling order, the deadline for completion of all discovery, including filing all motions to compel discovery, was November 20, 2023. (ECF No. 34.) Currently before the Court are Plaintiff’s motions requesting documents and appointment of counsel, both filed April 4, 2024. (ECF Nos. 43, 44.) Defendant has…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.