(SS) O'Neal v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:23-cv-00619California10,025 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1

2

3

4

5

6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8

9 CHRISTOPHER O’NEAL, Case No. 1:23-cv-00619-TLN-SAB

10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

RECOMMENDING GRANTING

11 v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY

JUDGMENT AND REMANDING THIS

12 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL ACTION FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS

SECURITY,

13 (ECF Nos. 10, 14, 15) Defendant. 14 OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOUREEN

DAYS

15 16 I. 17 INTRODUCTION 18 Christopher O’Neal (“Plaintiff”) seeks judicial review of a final decision of the 19 Commissioner of Social Security (“Commissioner” or “Defendant”) denying his application for 20 disability benefits pursuant to the Social Security Act. Plaintiff requests the decision of 21 Commissioner be vacated and the case be remanded for payment of benefits, or in the alternative, further 22 proceedings, arguing the administrative law judge did not properly evaluate his symptom testimony and 23 failed to address later evidence in the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.