Dahl

(PC) Adams v. Dahl

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:23-cv-01608California2,573 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 PAUL ADAMS, Case No. 1:23-cv-01608-BAM (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN DISTRICT JUDGE TO

13 v. ACTION 14 ANDY DAHL, et al., FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

15 Defendants. REMAND ACTION TO STATE COURT AND

DISMISSAL OF FEDERAL CLAIMS

16 (ECF No. 4) 17

FOURTEEN (14) DAY DEADLINE

18 19 I. Background 20 Plaintiff Paul Adams (“Plaintiff”) is a former state prisoner proceeding through counsel in 21 this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This action was removed from Kern County 22 Superior Court on November 14, 2023 by Defendants Dahl, Hernandez, Kendrick, and King 23 (“Defendants”). (ECF No. 1.) 24 On December 4, 2023, Plaintiff filed a motion to remand this action to state court. (ECF 25 No. 4.) Defendants filed an opposition, together with a request for judicial notice, on December 26 26, 2023. (ECF No. 7.) Plaintiff did not file a reply…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.