Cano

(PC) KasenzangaKhona v. Cano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 8, 20241:23-cv-01764California1,216 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 SHAKAZULU SIGIDI Case No.: 1:23-cv-001764-JLT-SKO

KASENZANGAKHONA,

12 ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S Plaintiff, FILING OF APRIL 4, 2024 13 v. (Doc. 18) 14

L. CANO, et al.,

15 Defendants.

16

17 18 Plaintiff Shakazulu Sigidi KasenzangaKhona is proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis 19 in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 I. INTRODUCTION 21 Plaintiff filed his complaint on December 26, 2023. (Doc. 1.) On January 22, 2024, 22 Plaintiff filed a “Writ of Mandate.” (Doc. 10.) 23 On March 12, 2024, the Court issued its First Screening Order. (Doc. 12.) The Court 24 found Plaintiff’s original complaint fails to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. (Id. at 25 4-12.) Plaintiff was granted leave to file an amended complaint, within 21 days, curing the 26 deficiencies identified in the complaint. (Id. at 13-14.) On March 12, 2024, the Court also issued 27 Findings and Recommendations to Deny Plaintiff’s Request for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.