Escobedo

Escobedo v. Solano

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20241:24-cv-00373California1,015 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8

JOSE ESCOBEDO,

9 Case No. 1:24-cv-00373-SKO Plaintiff, 10

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE

v. 11 SUPPLEMENTAL JURISDICTION

NICOLE SOLANO dba CHALIO’S FRESNO, 12 et al., 14 DAY DEADLINE 13 Defendants.

14 15 On April 1, 2024, Plaintiff Jose Escobedo (“Plaintiff”) filed his complaint against 16 Defendants Nicole Solano dba Chalio’s Fresno; David C. Yang, Trustee of the David C. Yang and 17 Susie U. Yang AB Living Trust; and Susie U. Yang, Trustee of the David C. Yang and Susie U. 18 Yang AB Living Trust (“Defendants”), alleging claims under the American with Disabilities Act 19 (“ADA”), California’s Unruh Civil Rights Act (“Unruh Act”), and California’s Health and Safety 20 Code. (Doc. 1). These claims stem from alleged barriers Plaintiff encountered (such as excessive 21 slopes and height changes) while he visited a facility owned, operated, or leased by Defendants— 22 Chalio’s Fresno. (See id.) 23 Based upon the Ninth Circuit opinion in Vo v. Choi, the Court will order…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.