Unknown

(PC) Hatton v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20242:23-cv-02996California426 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 DONALD JAMES BRUCE HATTON, Sr., Case No. 2:23-cv-02996-JDP (PC) 12 Plaintiff, ORDER 13 v. DIRECTING THE CLERK OF COURT TO

RANDOMLY ASSIGN A DISTRICT JUDGE

14 UNKNOWN, TO THIS MATTER 15 Defendant. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 16 THAT THIS ACTION BE DISMISSED

WITHOUT PREJUDICE FOR FAILURE TO

17 PAY THE REQUIRED FILING FEE AND

COMPLY WITH COURT ORDERS

18

OBJECTIONS DUE WITHIN FOURTEEN

19 DAYS 20 21 On December 28, 2023, I ordered plaintiff to submit, within thirty days, either the 22 required filing fee or a complete application to proceed in forma pauperis. ECF No. 3. When 23 plaintiff did not file a timely response, on February 7, 2024, I ordered him to show cause within 24 twenty-one days why this action should not be dismissed for his failure to complete an application 25 to proceed in forma pauperis or pay the required filing fee. ECF No.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.