(HC) Calloway, Jr. v. The People of the State of California

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 9, 20241:24-cv-00330California682 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TONY CARL CALLOWAY, JR., No. 1:24-cv-00330-HBK (HC) Petitioner, ORDER GRANTING PETITIONER LEAVE

TO FILE MOTION TO AMEND TO NAME A

v. PROPER RESPONDENT THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF THIRTY DAY DEADLINE

CALIFORNIA,

15 Respondent. 16 On March 20, 2024, Petitioner filed a petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. (Doc. No. 1). Petitioner names “the People of the State of California” as respondent in this action. (See generally id.). This is not a proper respondent; therefore, Petitioner will be granted leave to amend the respondent in order to avoid dismissal of the action. Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases requires the Court to make a preliminary review of each petition for writ of habeas corpus. The Court must dismiss a petition "[i]f it plainly appears from the petition . . . that the petitioner is not entitled to relief." Rule 4 of the Rules Governing § 2254 Cases; see also Hendricks v. Vasquez, 908…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.