(SS) Crump v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20241:24-cv-00420California1,137 words

Opinion

trial_court Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JOSHUA AARON CRUMP, Case No. 1:24-cv-00420-CDB (SS)

12 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION TO

PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS AND

13 v. DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT TO ISSUE

SUMMONS, SCHEDULING ORDER, AND

14 COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL CONSENT OR REQUEST FOR

SECURITY, REASSIGNMENT DOCUMENTS

15 Defendant. (Doc. 2) 16 17 18 Joshua Aaron Crump (“Plaintiff”) filed a complaint in this action on April 9, 2024, 19 seeking review of the final decision of the Commissioner of Social Security denying disability 20 benefits. (Doc. 1). Plaintiff did not pay the filing fee and instead filed an application to proceed 21 in forma pauperis (or “IFP”) pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (Doc. 2). For the following reasons, 22 the Court finds issuance of the new case documents and Plaintiff’s application to proceed in 23 forma pauperis appropriate. 24 I. Proceeding in forma pauperis 25 The Court may authorize the commencement of an action without prepayment of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.