(PS) Thomas v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20242:21-cv-01492California775 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBY N. THOMAS, No. 2:21-cv-01492-TLN-DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION,

15 Defendant.

18 This matter is before the Court on a Motion to Withdraw filed by Parham Nikfarjam of Javaheri & Yahoudai, APLC, attorney of record for Plaintiff. (ECF No. 28.) Defendant did not file an opposition. For the reasons set forth below, the Court GRANTS the motion. The local rules of this district require an attorney who would withdraw and leave his or her client without representation to obtain leave of court upon a noticed motion. E.D. Cal. L.R. 182(d). Local Rule 182(d) also requires an attorney to provide notice to the client and all other parties who have appeared, and an affidavit stating the current or last known address of the client. Id. Finally, to comply with Local Rule 182(d), the attorney must conform to the requirements of the California Rules of Professional Conduct. Id. /// The decision to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.