Zetterholm

(PC) Ramsey v. Zetterholm

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 10, 20242:24-cv-00034California299 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 DANIEL C. RAMSEY, No. 2:24-cv-0034 CSK P Plaintiff, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS &

RECOMMENDATIONS

S. ZETTERHOLM, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se. By order filed February 15, 2024, plaintiff’s complaint was dismissed, and thirty days leave to file an amended complaint was granted. (ECF No. 7.) Thirty days from that date have now passed, and plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint, or otherwise responded to the court’s order. In accordance with the above, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court is directed to assign a district judge to this case; and IT IS RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. See Local Rule 110; Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(b). These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days after being…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.