(PC) Whiteman v. Shasta County Jail

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaApril 5, 20242:24-cv-00166California2,538 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CORRY WHITEMAN, No. 2:24-cv-0166 AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SHASTA COUNTY JAIL, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a county prisoner proceeding pro se, seeks relief pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. By order filed February 16, 2024, the undersigned screened the complaint and found that it did not state a claim for relief. ECF No. 8. Plaintiff was given an opportunity to file an amended complaint and has now filed a first amended complaint along with a motion for appointment of counsel. ECF Nos. 10, 11. I. Statutory Screening of Prisoner Complaints The court is required to screen complaints brought by prisoners seeking relief against “a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity.” 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). The court must dismiss a complaint or portion thereof if the prisoner has raised claims that are “frivolous, malicious, or fail[] to state a claim upon which relief may be granted,” or that “seek[]…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.