Material Handling Systems, Inc. v. Rack Men Equipment Co, Inc.
Opinion
trial_court Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 MATERIAL HANDLING SYSTEM, No. 2:23-cv-01089 WBS AC 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. ORDER 14 RACK MEN EQUIPMENT COMPANY,
INC.,
15 Defendant. 16 17 18 This matter is before the court on plaintiff’s motion to compel responses to discovery. 19 ECF No. 33. This discovery motion was referred to the magistrate judge pursuant to E.D. Cal. 20 R. 302(c)(1). Plaintiffs and defendants, through counsel, filed the required joint statement. ECF 21 No. 37. Plaintiff’s counsel filed a supplemental declaration. ECF No. 38. The matter was taken 22 under submission. ECF No. 34. For the reasons set forth below, the motion is DENIED. 23 I. Relevant Background 24 This is a trademark case that was initially filed in June of 2023. Defendant filed an 25 answer and counterclaims. ECF Nos. 8. A scheduling conference was initially set for October, 26 10, 2023 before Senior District Judge William B. Shubb. ECF No. 4. Following motions to 27 dismiss the counterclaims, the initial…